Mastering CELPIP Survey Responses: Why Your Structure Matters More Than Your Choice

One of the biggest surprises I had when I started practicing for the CELPIP writing test was realizing that the "survey" isn't actually about the survey results.

Whether the prompt asks you to choose between a new office gym or a transit subsidy, the examiners aren't looking for the "right" answer—there isn't one. They are looking at how you build a logical bridge between your choice and your reasons.

In my own prep, I’ve found that the difference between a CLB 7 and a CLB 9 often comes down to how "real" your examples feel.

💡 Quick Summary: The CLB 9+ Checklist

If you're studying on your lunch break, here are the non-negotiables:

Pick one side: Don't be neutral. Commit to one option.
The "Counter-Argument": Briefly explain why the other option isn't the best choice right now.
Specific Examples: Mention "neighbors," "colleagues," or "local shops" to make it feel grounded.
Word Count: Aim for 170-190 words to stay safe.

The Logic of the "Other Side"

Most of us are tempted to just list all the good things about our choice. However, to show true language proficiency, you need to acknowledge the other option. This shows you can handle complex social reasoning.

Think of it like a real conversation: if you're trying to convince a friend to go to a specific restaurant, you don't just say the food is good; you might say, "I know that other place is closer, but the quality here is worth the extra ten-minute walk." That contrast is what makes your writing sound natural.

A Real-World Example: The "City Park vs. Parking Lot" Prompt

Imagine a survey asking if the city should build a green park or a multilevel parking garage in your neighborhood. Here is how you can structure that response to sound like a resident, not a textbook.

1. The Opening (Pick a Side Fast)

Start by stating your preference immediately. Don’t waste words being vague.

"I am writing to express my strong support for the construction of a green park in our neighborhood. While I understand the need for better infrastructure, I believe the long-term benefits of a community space far outweigh those of a parking facility."

2. The Personal "Why" (The Context)

This is where you make it human. Use a realistic scenario. For instance, mentioning the specific lack of safe play areas for children creates a vivid picture for the evaluator.

3. The Economic or Social "Why"

Give a second, different type of reason to show breadth. You might mention how parks increase property values or support local cafes. This shows the examiner you can think about the "big picture."

4. The Counter-Argument (The Contrast)

Briefly explain why the other option isn't the priority right now.

"Although a parking garage might slightly reduce street congestion, it wouldn't contribute to the community's well-being in the same way a park would. In fact, it might even encourage more traffic in an already busy residential area."

❓ Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: Do I lose points if my opinion is unpopular? A: Absolutely not. I used to worry about this too! You are graded on your English, not your political views.

Q: How many paragraphs should I write? A: Three to four is the sweet spot. One for the intro/choice, two for your reasons/comparison, and a quick one-sentence closing.

A Few Things I've Learned While Studying:

Connectors are your friends: Use words like "Furthermore" and "Consequently"—they act as signposts for the reader.
Be specific: Don't just say "it's good for people." Say "it's beneficial for elderly residents who need a place to walk."
The "Wait" Rule: I always try to leave 2 minutes at the end to check for small typos.

I’m currently building out the simulator for this exact task so we can all practice typing these within the 26-minute limit. In the meantime, try using this "comparison" style in your next practice session!